JWTruth.orgDocumented comparison resource
Search

Blood doctrine · Claim record

The same 1951 answer said Witnesses 'do not oppose the people's use of transfusions, but allow each one the right to decide for himself', and mentioned no congregational penalty; the organisation's history dates disfellowshipping for the practice to 1961.

Claim ID claim-blood-1951-no-penalty-statedConcerns 1 July 1951Strong implication
Strong implication · 1 July 1951 Verified

The same 1951 answer said Witnesses 'do not oppose the people's use of transfusions, but allow each one the right to decide for himself', and mentioned no congregational penalty; the organisation's history dates disfellowshipping for the practice to 1961. The Watchtower, 1 July 1951Jehovah's Witnesses—Proclaimers of God's Kingdom (book), 1993

Show the evidence (2 sources)
Primary JW publication Verified

The Watchtower, “Questions From Readers”

1 July 1951 · pp.414-416 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society

“Hence the attendant administering the transfusion is feeding the patient blood through the veins, and the patient receiving it is eating it through his veins.”

Answering 'Many say receiving a transfusion is not like eating blood. Is this view sound?'. p. 416 adds: 'Jehovah's witnesses do not oppose the people's use of transfusions, but allow each one the right to decide for himself what he can conscientiously do.' No congregational sanction is mentioned.

Official source

Provenance and verification note

Confidence note. Opened on WOL; wording, date and pages confirmed.

Notes. The 'each one … decide for himself' sentence is addressed to the public's use; do not over-read it as a formal members' conscience rule.

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-w-1951-0701-qfr-transfusion

Primary JW publication Verified

Jehovah's Witnesses—Proclaimers of God's Kingdom (book), “Recognized by Our Conduct”

1993 · p.183 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society

“When transfusions of blood became an issue confronting them, The Watchtower of July 1, 1945, explained at length the Christian view regarding the sanctity of blood.”

Also: 'Earlier discussions of the sanctity of blood appeared in The Watch Tower of December 15, 1927, as well as The Watchtower of December 1, 1944, which specifically mentioned blood transfusions.' And: 'beginning in 1961 any who ignored the divine requirement, accepted blood transfusions, and manifested an unrepentant attitude were disfellowshipped'.

Official source

Provenance and verification note

Confidence note. Opened on WOL; p. 183 confirmed.

Corroborated by. src-w-1987-0301-history-chart, src-w-1961-0115-qfr-disfellowshipping

Notes. The organisation's own dating of 1945 and 1961.

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-jv-1993-recognized-by-conduct

Claim page

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/evidence/claim-blood-1951-no-penalty-stated/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.