ClaimDoctrine changesverified1950sExplicit statement

Doctrine changes · Claim record

For decades the organisation's publications identified individual Bible characters as prophetic pictures of modern classes of Witnesses — for example Rahab as a picture of the great crowd.

Claim ID claim-doctrine-chg-antitypes-earlierConcerns 15 December 1959Explicit statement

The claim and its evidence

Explicit statement · 15 December 1959 Verified

For decades the organisation's publications identified individual Bible characters as prophetic pictures of modern classes of Witnesses — for example Rahab as a picture of the great crowd. Source: The Watchtower, 15 December 1959Source: The Watchtower, 15 March 2015

The organisation’s position or later explanation: The 2015 answer names Deborah, Elihu, Jephthah, Job, Rahab and Rebekah as characters its publications had treated as types.

Show the evidence (2 sources)
Primary JW publication Verified

The Watchtower, “The Seeking of Peace”

15 December 1959 · p.748 · par. 25 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society

“This “great crowd” was anciently pictured by the Canaanite woman named Rahab in the days of Joshua, the successor of Moses.”

An example of the kind of typical application that the 2015 answer set aside: a named Bible character read as a prophetic picture of a modern class of Witnesses.

Provenance and verification note for The Watchtower, The Seeking of Peace

Confidence note. Document opened on wol.jw.org on 19 September 2026; the wording was read in full and the page number taken from the library's own page markers.

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-chg-d-w-1959-1215-rahab-type

Primary JW publication Verified

The Watchtower, “Questions From Readers”

15 March 2015 · pp.17-18 · pars. 4, 9 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society

“Many years ago, our publications stated that such faithful men and women as Deborah, Elihu, Jephthah, Job, Rahab, and Rebekah, as well as many others, were really types, or shadows, of either the anointed or the “great crowd.” … The clearest course is this: Where the Scriptures teach that an individual, an event, or an object is typical of something else, we accept it as such. Otherwise, we ought to be reluctant to assign an antitypical application to a certain person or account if there is no specific Scriptural basis for doing so.”

The answer explains why the publications had stopped assigning prophetic “antitypes”, conceding that “Humans cannot know which Bible accounts are shadows of things to come and which are not.”

Provenance and verification note for The Watchtower, Questions From Readers

Confidence note. Document opened on wol.jw.org on 19 September 2026; the wording was read in full and the page number taken from the library's own page markers.

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-chg-d-w-2015-0315-qfr-types

Claim page

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/evidence/claim-doctrine-chg-antitypes-earlier/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.