ClaimChronology and 607 BCEverified2010sExplicit statement

Cronologia e 607 AEC · Claim record

A série de 2011 coloca o ônus da prova sobre as evidências seculares, concluindo que os historiadores clássicos e o cânon de Ptolomeu ‘hardly provide enough proof to overturn the Bible’s chronology’.

Claim ID claim-chronology-burden-of-proofConcerns 1 de outubro de 2011Declaração explícita

A afirmação e as suas provas

Declaração explícita · 1 de outubro de 2011 Verificado

A série de 2011 coloca o ônus da prova sobre as evidências seculares, concluindo que os historiadores clássicos e o cânon de Ptolomeu ‘hardly provide enough proof to overturn the Bible’s chronology’. Source: The Watchtower, 1 de outubro de 2011

A posição da organização ou explicação posterior: A seção final da Parte Dois expõe a razão da organização para essa abordagem: ‘Secular experts have repeatedly questioned the Bible’s accuracy. Yet, when more evidence is uncovered, the Bible record has time and again been vindicated.’

Mostrar as provas (1 fonte)
Publicação primária das Testemunhas de Jeová Verificado

The Watchtower, “When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?—Part One”

1 de outubro de 2011 · p.31 · par. 38 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“Though the classical historians and the canon of Ptolemy disagree with this date, valid questions can be raised about the accuracy of their writings. Really, those two lines of evidence hardly provide enough proof to overturn the Bible’s chronology.”

The summing-up of Part One. The accompanying box “A QUICK SUMMARY” on the same page reads: “Secular historians usually say that Jerusalem was destroyed in 587 B.C.E. ▪ Bible chronology strongly indicates that the destruction occurred in 607 B.C.E. ▪ Secular historians mainly base their conclusions on the writings of classical historians and on the canon of Ptolemy. ▪ The writings of classical historians contain significant errors and are not always consistent with the records on clay tablets.”

Nota de procedência e verificação for The Watchtower, When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?—Part One

Nota de confiança. Full document fetched from the Watchtower Online Library on 19 September 2026 and read in full; the quotation, the paragraph and the page were confirmed against the article text and its embedded page markers (span class=“pageNum”).

Corroborado por. src-chr-o-w-2011-1101-why-trust-bible

Notes. The burden of proof is expressly placed on the secular evidence: it must be enough “to overturn the Bible’s chronology”.

Consultado em. 19 de setembro de 2026 · Identificador da fonte. src-chr-o-w-2011-1001-conclusion

Página da afirmação Corrigir ou atualizar

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/pt-br/evidence/claim-chronology-burden-of-proof/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.