ClaimChronology and 607 BCEverified2010sExplicit statement

Chronology and 607 BCE · Claim record

The 2011 series places the burden of proof on the secular evidence, concluding that the classical historians and Ptolemy’s canon ‘hardly provide enough proof to overturn the Bible’s chronology’.

Claim ID claim-chronology-burden-of-proofConcerns 1 October 2011Explicit statement

The claim and its evidence

Explicit statement · 1 October 2011 Verified

The 2011 series places the burden of proof on the secular evidence, concluding that the classical historians and Ptolemy’s canon ‘hardly provide enough proof to overturn the Bible’s chronology’. Source: The Watchtower, 1 October 2011

The organisation’s position or later explanation: The closing section of Part Two states the organisation’s reason for that approach: ‘Secular experts have repeatedly questioned the Bible’s accuracy. Yet, when more evidence is uncovered, the Bible record has time and again been vindicated.’

Show the evidence (1 source)
Primary JW publication Verified

The Watchtower, “When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?—Part One”

1 October 2011 · p.31 · par. 38 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“Though the classical historians and the canon of Ptolemy disagree with this date, valid questions can be raised about the accuracy of their writings. Really, those two lines of evidence hardly provide enough proof to overturn the Bible’s chronology.”

The summing-up of Part One. The accompanying box “A QUICK SUMMARY” on the same page reads: “Secular historians usually say that Jerusalem was destroyed in 587 B.C.E. ▪ Bible chronology strongly indicates that the destruction occurred in 607 B.C.E. ▪ Secular historians mainly base their conclusions on the writings of classical historians and on the canon of Ptolemy. ▪ The writings of classical historians contain significant errors and are not always consistent with the records on clay tablets.”

Provenance and verification note for The Watchtower, When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?—Part One

Confidence note. Full document fetched from the Watchtower Online Library on 19 September 2026 and read in full; the quotation, the paragraph and the page were confirmed against the article text and its embedded page markers (span class=“pageNum”).

Corroborated by. src-chr-o-w-2011-1101-why-trust-bible

Notes. The burden of proof is expressly placed on the secular evidence: it must be enough “to overturn the Bible’s chronology”.

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-chr-o-w-2011-1001-conclusion

Claim page

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/evidence/claim-chronology-burden-of-proof/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.