A posição pública atual da organização é que as pessoas removidas são tratadas 'com respeito', são 'bem-vindas a assistir às nossas reuniões religiosas, onde podem ser cumprimentadas', podem pedir ajuda aos anciãos, e que o cônjuge e os filhos pequenos de uma pessoa removida que morem na mesma casa mantêm 'as afeições e o relacionamento normais de família'; as perguntas frequentes não tratam de parentes que moram em outro lugar, e aplicam o texto de 2 João sobre não cumprimentar apenas aos que 'tentam ativamente minar' a congregação.

Claim ID claim-shunning-faq-current-positionConcerns 18 de setembro de 2026Explicação da organização

Explicação da organização · 18 de setembro de 2026 Verificado

A posição pública atual da organização é que as pessoas removidas são tratadas 'com respeito', são 'bem-vindas a assistir às nossas reuniões religiosas, onde podem ser cumprimentadas', podem pedir ajuda aos anciãos, e que o cônjuge e os filhos pequenos de uma pessoa removida que morem na mesma casa mantêm 'as afeições e o relacionamento normais de família'; as perguntas frequentes não tratam de parentes que moram em outro lugar, e aplicam o texto de 2 João sobre não cumprimentar apenas aos que 'tentam ativamente minar' a congregação. Source: jw.org, Frequently Asked Questions, 18 de setembro de 2026 Source: Supreme Court of Norway (Høyesterett), judgment HR-2026-1009-A (case no. 25-089326SIV-HRET), official English translation published 16 July 2026, 29 de abril de 2026

Mostrar as provas (2 fontes)

Publicação primária das Testemunhas de Jeová Verificado

jw.org, Frequently Asked Questions, “How Do Jehovah’s Witnesses Treat Those Who Used to Belong to Their Religion?”

18 de setembro de 2026 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“So we do not socialize with someone who has been removed. However, we do not ignore him completely. We treat him with respect. He is welcome to attend our religious services, where he may be greeted by Jehovah’s Witnesses. He may also request spiritual assistance from the elders.”

Current official statement. Also: 'we reach out' to those who 'slowed down or stopped'; 'The elders simply announce to the congregation that the person is no longer one of Jehovah’s Witnesses'; spouse and young children in the same house keep 'normal family affections and dealings'; footnote b on terminology; footnote d applies 2 John 9-11 to those who 'actively try to undermine' the congregation. Says nothing about relatives outside the household. Quotes the High Court of England and Wales (7 June 2019) and former ECtHR judge Pinto de Albuquerque.

Fonte oficial (abre em nova aba)

Nota de procedência e verificação

Nota de confiança. Full page opened at both URLs on 2026-09-19. The old URL https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/shunning/ returns HTTP 301 to this URL (curl -I; server Last-Modified 18 Sep 2026). Earlier titles: 2022 version 'Do Jehovah’s Witnesses Shun Those Who Used to Belong to Their Religion?' is quoted by the Norwegian Supreme Court (para 125); the still-earlier title 'Do You Shun Former Members of Your Religion?' is attested only by discovery sources (unverified).

Corroborado por. src-court-no-2026-0429-supreme-court

Notes. Blocked original: https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/shunning/ (now redirects). web.archive.org and archive.ph blocked in this environment.

Consultado em. 19 de setembro de 2026 · Identificador da fonte. src-jworg-2026-faq-removed-from-the-congregation

Registro público oficial Verificado

Supreme Court of Norway (Høyesterett), judgment HR-2026-1009-A (case no. 25-089326SIV-HRET), official English translation published 16 July 2026, “The State (Ministry of Children and Families) v. Jehovah’s Witnesses; European Association of Jehovah’s Witnesses (intervener)”

29 de abril de 2026 · paras 4, 39-45, 94-102, 110-127, 149-152, 227-230 · Norges Høyesterett

“Members of the religious community are thus not to associate with former members, whether disfellowshipped or withdrawn. This also applies to close relatives, unless they belong to the same household. Family ties are not severed, but with regard to family members other than those with whom one lives, contact is permitted only in necessary family matters. It is undisputed that the threshold for such contact is relatively high.”

3-2 majority (Steen, Arntzen, Hellerslia; Poulsen and Falkanger dissenting) dismissed the State's appeal and declared the refusals of registration and grants invalid; unanimous that infringement of children's rights was not proved; majority: practice 'may entail a clear psychological pressure not to withdraw' (para 123) but not 'improper pressure' under Art. 9 ECHR; dissent: right to withdraw infringed. Costs NOK 2,165,461. Quotes od 2019 p. 148, lvs pp. 39-40, ks 2019 ch. 12 par. 17, w24 Aug p. 24 par. 18, the 2022 jw.org FAQ and a JW brochure 'Jehovah’s Witnesses and Disfellowshipping'.

Fonte oficial (abre em nova aba) Digitalização do original (abre em nova aba)

Nota de procedência e verificação

Nota de confiança. Official English translation PDF (https://www.domstol.no/globalassets/upload/hret/translated-rulings/2026/hr-2026-1009-a.pdf) downloaded and read; all quoted paragraphs confirmed. Norwegian original: https://www.domstol.no/globalassets/upload/hret/avgjorelser/2026/april/hr-2026-1009-a.pdf

Procedência da digitalização. Supreme Court of Norway, Communication Department translation (legal authenticity remains with the Norwegian text).

Consultado em. 19 de setembro de 2026 · Identificador da fonte. src-court-no-2026-0429-supreme-court

Página da afirmação Corrigir ou atualizar

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/pt-br/evidence/claim-shunning-faq-current-position/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.

A afirmação e as suas provas

jw.org, Frequently Asked Questions, “How Do Jehovah’s Witnesses Treat Those Who Used to Belong to Their Religion?”

Supreme Court of Norway (Høyesterett), judgment HR-2026-1009-A (case no. 25-089326SIV-HRET), official English translation published 16 July 2026, “The State (Ministry of Children and Families) v. Jehovah’s Witnesses; European Association of Jehovah’s Witnesses (intervener)”