JWTruth.orgRessource documentaire comparative
Ask JWTruth Rechercher
Français

Cette page en

En anglais uniquement

Toutes les langues

Ostracisme et famille · Claim record

La position publique actuelle de l'organisation est que les personnes exclues sont traitées 'with respect', qu'elles sont 'welcome to attend our religious services, where he may be greeted', qu'elles peuvent demander l'aide des anciens, et que le conjoint et les jeunes enfants d'une personne exclue vivant sous le même toit conservent des 'normal family affections and dealings' ; la FAQ n'aborde pas le cas des proches vivant ailleurs, et n'applique le texte de 2 Jean interdisant de 'saluer' qu'à ceux qui 'actively try to undermine' la congrégation.

Claim ID claim-shunning-faq-current-positionConcerns 18 septembre 2026Explication de l’organisation
Explication de l’organisation · 18 septembre 2026 Vérifié

La position publique actuelle de l'organisation est que les personnes exclues sont traitées 'with respect', qu'elles sont 'welcome to attend our religious services, where he may be greeted', qu'elles peuvent demander l'aide des anciens, et que le conjoint et les jeunes enfants d'une personne exclue vivant sous le même toit conservent des 'normal family affections and dealings' ; la FAQ n'aborde pas le cas des proches vivant ailleurs, et n'applique le texte de 2 Jean interdisant de 'saluer' qu'à ceux qui 'actively try to undermine' la congrégation. jw.org, Frequently Asked Questions, 18 septembre 2026Supreme Court of Norway (Høyesterett), judgment HR-2026-1009-A (case no. 25-089326SIV-HRET), official English translation published 16 July 2026, 29 avril 2026

Afficher les preuves (2 sources)
Publication primaire des Témoins de Jéhovah Vérifié

jw.org, Frequently Asked Questions, “How Do Jehovah’s Witnesses Treat Those Who Used to Belong to Their Religion?”

18 septembre 2026 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“So we do not socialize with someone who has been removed. However, we do not ignore him completely. We treat him with respect. He is welcome to attend our religious services, where he may be greeted by Jehovah’s Witnesses. He may also request spiritual assistance from the elders.”

Current official statement. Also: 'we reach out' to those who 'slowed down or stopped'; 'The elders simply announce to the congregation that the person is no longer one of Jehovah’s Witnesses'; spouse and young children in the same house keep 'normal family affections and dealings'; footnote b on terminology; footnote d applies 2 John 9-11 to those who 'actively try to undermine' the congregation. Says nothing about relatives outside the household. Quotes the High Court of England and Wales (7 June 2019) and former ECtHR judge Pinto de Albuquerque.

Source officielle

Note de provenance et de vérification

Note sur la fiabilité. Full page opened at both URLs on 2026-09-19. The old URL https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/shunning/ returns HTTP 301 to this URL (curl -I; server Last-Modified 18 Sep 2026). Earlier titles: 2022 version 'Do Jehovah’s Witnesses Shun Those Who Used to Belong to Their Religion?' is quoted by the Norwegian Supreme Court (para 125); the still-earlier title 'Do You Shun Former Members of Your Religion?' is attested only by discovery sources (unverified).

Corroboré par. src-court-no-2026-0429-supreme-court

Notes. Blocked original: https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/shunning/ (now redirects). web.archive.org and archive.ph blocked in this environment.

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-jworg-2026-faq-removed-from-the-congregation

Document public officiel Vérifié

Supreme Court of Norway (Høyesterett), judgment HR-2026-1009-A (case no. 25-089326SIV-HRET), official English translation published 16 July 2026, “The State (Ministry of Children and Families) v. Jehovah’s Witnesses; European Association of Jehovah’s Witnesses (intervener)”

29 avril 2026 · paras 4, 39-45, 94-102, 110-127, 149-152, 227-230 · Norges Høyesterett

“Members of the religious community are thus not to associate with former members, whether disfellowshipped or withdrawn. This also applies to close relatives, unless they belong to the same household. Family ties are not severed, but with regard to family members other than those with whom one lives, contact is permitted only in necessary family matters. It is undisputed that the threshold for such contact is relatively high.”

3-2 majority (Steen, Arntzen, Hellerslia; Poulsen and Falkanger dissenting) dismissed the State's appeal and declared the refusals of registration and grants invalid; unanimous that infringement of children's rights was not proved; majority: practice 'may entail a clear psychological pressure not to withdraw' (para 123) but not 'improper pressure' under Art. 9 ECHR; dissent: right to withdraw infringed. Costs NOK 2,165,461. Quotes od 2019 p. 148, lvs pp. 39-40, ks 2019 ch. 12 par. 17, w24 Aug p. 24 par. 18, the 2022 jw.org FAQ and a JW brochure 'Jehovah’s Witnesses and Disfellowshipping'.

Source officielle Numérisation de l’original

Note de provenance et de vérification

Note sur la fiabilité. Official English translation PDF (https://www.domstol.no/globalassets/upload/hret/translated-rulings/2026/hr-2026-1009-a.pdf) downloaded and read; all quoted paragraphs confirmed. Norwegian original: https://www.domstol.no/globalassets/upload/hret/avgjorelser/2026/april/hr-2026-1009-a.pdf

Provenance de la numérisation. Supreme Court of Norway, Communication Department translation (legal authenticity remains with the Norwegian text).

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-court-no-2026-0429-supreme-court

Page de l’affirmation Corriger ou mettre à jour

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/fr/evidence/claim-shunning-faq-current-position/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.