Source recordPrimary JW publicationverified2010sChronology and 607 BCE

Source record · Primary JW publication

The Watchtower, “When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?—Part Two”

1 November 2011p. 23Source ID src-chr-o-w-2011-1101-chroniclesAccessed 19 September 2026
Primary JW publication Verified

The Watchtower, “When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?—Part Two”

1 November 2011 · p.23 · pars. 12-15 and box · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“There are gaps in the history recorded in the Babylonian chronicles. … Logically, then, the question arises, How reliable are deductions based on such an incomplete record?”

The accompanying box, “THE BABYLONIAN CHRONICLES—A HISTORY WITH GAPS”, states: “The Babylonian chronicles provide an account for only 35 years of the Neo-Babylonian period, traditionally presumed to span some 88 years.” The text quotes R. H. Sack that historians must probe “secondary sources . . . in the hope of determining what actually happened.”

Provenance and verification note for The Watchtower, When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?—Part Two

Confidence note. Full document fetched from the Watchtower Online Library on 19 September 2026 and read in full; the quotation, the paragraph and the page were confirmed against the article text and its embedded page markers (span class=“pageNum”).

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-chr-o-w-2011-1101-chronicles