Source recordReputable reportingsupported1920sRace, women and health

Source record · Reputable reporting

Scientific American, “Our Abrams Verdict”

September 1924p. 158Source ID src-hlth-sciam-1924-abrams-verdictAccessed 19 September 2026
Reputable reporting Supported

Scientific American, “Our Abrams Verdict”

September 1924 · p.158 · Austin C. Lescarboura · Munn & Co.

“The Electronic Reactions of Abrams and Electronic Medicine in General Found Utterly Worthless”

The concluding article of Scientific American's investigation of the Electronic Reactions of Abrams, published in volume 131, number 3 (September 1924). The words quoted are the article's own subtitle, quoted in full; the body of the article was not read.

Provenance and verification note for Scientific American, Our Abrams Verdict

Confidence note. The article's landing page on scientificamerican.com was opened on 19 September 2026 and confirms the title, the author, the issue (vol. 131 no. 3, September 1924), the page (158) and the subtitle quoted here in full. The full text is behind the publisher's archive paywall and was not read, so the verdict is recorded from the subtitle and from the Quackwatch account rather than from the body of the article. An earlier version of this record quoted only the words 'Found Utterly Worthless', which is a fragment of the middle of that subtitle.

Corroborated by. src-hlth-quackwatch-2002-radionics

Notes. The verdict was published in September 1924, seven months before The Golden Age printed its endorsement of the Biola in April 1925.

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-hlth-sciam-1924-abrams-verdict