Source recordOfficial public recordverified2000sBlood doctrine

Source record · Official public record

Supreme Court of Canada, “A.C. v. Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), 2009 SCC 30, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 181”

26 June 2009pp. para. 87; headnoteSource ID src-scc-2009-ac-v-manitobaAccessed 19 September 2026
Official public record Verified

Supreme Court of Canada, “A.C. v. Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), 2009 SCC 30, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 181”

26 June 2009 · pp.para. 87; headnote · para. 87 · Abella J. (majority); Binnie J. dissenting · Supreme Court of Canada

“The more a court is satisfied that a child is capable of making a mature, independent decision on his or her own behalf, the greater the weight that will be given to his or her views when a court is exercising its discretion under s. 25(8).”

A.C., aged 14 years 10 months, admitted with lower GI bleeding from Crohn's disease; had signed an advance directive refusing blood; order of the applications judge dated 16 April 2006; the 'best interests' standard 'operates as a sliding scale of scrutiny'. 'Appeal dismissed, Binnie J. dissenting.' The list of authorities cites Re L.D.K. (1985), 48 R.F.L. (2d) 164 and Re A.Y. (1993), 111 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 91.

Provenance and verification note for Supreme Court of Canada, A.C. v. Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), 2009 SCC 30, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 181

Confidence note. Opened the official SCC PDF (114 pp., bilingual); quotations and facts confirmed.

Scan provenance. Official SCC PDF of the reported judgment (S.C.R.), retrieved by curl

Corroborated by. src-crin-ac-v-manitoba

Notes. The court overrode the refusal; A.C. survived; costs awarded to her.

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-scc-2009-ac-v-manitoba