Der Artikel hält fest, dass das erstinstanzliche Gericht in Chicago, nachdem es die siebzehnjährige E.G. für eine reife Minderjährige befunden hatte, die Transfusion gleichwohl anordnete, und dass ‘the transfusion was forcibly given to Ernestine in spite of her vigorous protests’.

Awake!, “Youths Who Have “Power Beyond What Is Normal””

22. Mai 1994 · p.15 · par. 59 · Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc.

“The court found that Ernestine was a mature 17-year-old, able to make informed medical decisions; yet, amazingly, the court granted an order allowing blood transfusions. At the hospital two doctors were standing by, transfusion equipment set up, and as soon as the court’s decision came in, the transfusion was forcibly given to Ernestine in spite of her vigorous protests.”

The article’s account of the trial-court stage of the Chicago proceedings reported as In re E.G. It names Dr Stanley Yachnin, Dr Ner Littner and the hospital’s attorney Jane McAtee as witnesses, all three of whom appear in the reported judgments.

Offizielle Quelle ↗ (öffnet in einem neuen Tab)