ClaimBlood doctrineverified1980sContext

Blutlehre · Claim record

Die Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. trat vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof von Illinois in In re E.G. als amicus curiae auf, vertreten durch Donald T. Ridley aus Brooklyn; die Organisation war damit an dem Rechtsstreit beteiligt, den sie ihren Lesern später beschrieb.

Claim ID claim-blood-1994-watchtower-amicusConcerns 18. November 1989Zusammenhang

Die Aussage und ihre Belege

Zusammenhang · 18. November 1989 Geprüft

Die Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. trat vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof von Illinois in In re E.G. als amicus curiae auf, vertreten durch Donald T. Ridley aus Brooklyn; die Organisation war damit an dem Rechtsstreit beteiligt, den sie ihren Lesern später beschrieb. Source: Illinois Supreme Court, 18. November 1989

Belege anzeigen (1 Quelle)
Amtliches öffentliches Dokument Geprüft

Illinois Supreme Court, “In re E.G., a Minor (The People of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. E.G., a Minor, Appellee), 133 Ill. 2d 98 (1989), No. 66089”

18. November 1989 · pp.133 Ill. 2d 98 · Ryan J · Illinois Supreme Court

“If the evidence is clear and convincing that the minor is mature enough to appreciate the consequences of her actions, and that the minor is mature enough to exercise the judgment of an adult, then the mature minor doctrine affords her the common law right to consent to or refuse medical treatment.”

The passage the 22 May 1994 Awake! quotes, confirmed against the reported text. Opinion filed 18 November 1989; rehearing denied 29 January 1990; Ward and Clark JJ dissenting. The head matter records that the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. appeared as amicus curiae, by Donald T. Ridley of Brooklyn, New York.

Hinweis zu Herkunft und Überprüfung for Illinois Supreme Court, In re E.G., a Minor (The People of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. E.G., a Minor, Appellee), 133 Ill. 2d 98 (1989), No. 66089

Hinweis zur Vertrauensangabe. The full reported opinion was downloaded from the Caselaw Access Project and read; the quoted sentence, the parties, the date and the amicus entry were confirmed. Justia and CourtListener both refuse automated requests in this environment.

Herkunft des Scans. Caselaw Access Project (Harvard Law School Library) static distribution of the official Illinois Reports text.

Untermauert durch. src-g94d-gregory-appeals-and-standard

Notes. The Court decided the case on common-law grounds and expressly declined to decide the First Amendment question on which the Appellate Court had relied.

Abgerufen. 19. September 2026 · Quellenkennung. src-g94d-ilsc-1989-eg-standard

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/de/evidence/claim-blood-1994-watchtower-amicus/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.