ClaimChronology and 607 BCEverified2010sOrganisation's explanation

Chronologie und 607 v. u. Z. · Claim record

In einer Fußnote zum eigenen Artikel der Organisation heißt es: 'None of the secular experts quoted in this article hold that Jerusalem was destroyed in 607 B.C.E.'

Claim ID claim-chronology-org-concedes-no-expertConcerns 1. November 2011Erklärung der Organisation

Die Aussage und ihre Belege

Erklärung der Organisation · 1. November 2011 Geprüft

In einer Fußnote zum eigenen Artikel der Organisation heißt es: 'None of the secular experts quoted in this article hold that Jerusalem was destroyed in 607 B.C.E.' Source: The Watchtower, 1. November 2011

Belege anzeigen (1 Quelle)
Primärveröffentlichung von Jehovas Zeugen Geprüft

The Watchtower, “When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?-Part Two, footnote c”

1. November 2011 · p.23 · footnote c · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“Note: None of the secular experts quoted in this article hold that Jerusalem was destroyed in 607 B.C.E.”

The article quotes R. H. Sack, John Steele, David Brown and R. J. van der Spek on the limits of the cuneiform evidence, and adds this footnote.

Hinweis zu Herkunft und Überprüfung for The Watchtower, When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?-Part Two, footnote c

Hinweis zur Vertrauensangabe. Read in the Watchtower Online Library text of the article on 19 September 2026 in the [Footnotes] section. The Online Library prints all footnotes together at the end of the article, so the page is taken from the position of the footnote’s reference marker in the body: the marker for note c falls between the page markers for pages 23 and 24.

Abgerufen. 19. September 2026 · Quellenkennung. src-chr-e-w11-1101-footnote-c

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/de/evidence/claim-chronology-org-concedes-no-expert/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.