JWTruth.orgDokumentierte Vergleichsquelle
Ask JWTruth Suchen
Deutsch

Diese Seite auf

Nur auf Englisch

Alle Sprachen

Die Bibel und die Übersetzung · Claim record

Walsh v. The Lord Advocate war eine Feststellungsklage vor dem Court of Session in Edinburgh mit dem Ziel der Feststellung, dass Douglas Walsh ein ‘regular minister’ und damit vom Wehrdienst befreit sei. Lord Strachan verhandelte die Beweisaufnahme ab dem 23. November 1954 und verkündete das Urteil am 7. Januar 1955; er befand, dass Jehovas Zeugen eine Religionsgemeinschaft sind, dass Walsh aber kein ‘regular minister’ war. Die Second Division und anschließend das House of Lords wiesen die Berufung zurück; das Urteil erging am 19. Juli 1956.

Claim ID claim-bible-walsh-case-recordConcerns 23. November 1954Zusammenhang
Zusammenhang · 23. November 1954 Geprüft

Walsh v. The Lord Advocate war eine Feststellungsklage vor dem Court of Session in Edinburgh mit dem Ziel der Feststellung, dass Douglas Walsh ein ‘regular minister’ und damit vom Wehrdienst befreit sei. Lord Strachan verhandelte die Beweisaufnahme ab dem 23. November 1954 und verkündete das Urteil am 7. Januar 1955; er befand, dass Jehovas Zeugen eine Religionsgemeinschaft sind, dass Walsh aber kein ‘regular minister’ war. Die Second Division und anschließend das House of Lords wiesen die Berufung zurück; das Urteil erging am 19. Juli 1956. The Watchtower, 1. Juni 1955The Weekly Law Reports, 19. Juli 1956

Die Position der Organisation oder ihre spätere Erklärung: Der Wachtturm vom 1. Juni 1955 begrüßte die Feststellung, dass die Zeugen eine Religionsgemeinschaft sind, und zitierte Lord Strachans Aussage, die Mitarbeiterschaft der Zentrale ‘is sincerely and genuinely engaged upon the task of administering a body which they regard as religious’, bestritt jedoch die Entscheidung zum Predigtamt.

Belege anzeigen (2 Quellen)
Primärveröffentlichung von Jehovas Zeugen Geprüft

The Watchtower, “Jehovah’s Witnesses—A Religion Without Ministers?”

1. Juni 1955 · pp.329-332 · Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc.

“An action for declarator was brought in Scotland that asked the Court of Session to declare that Douglas Walsh was a “regular minister” because of his appointment as a pioneer and also because of his appointment as a congregation servant. The case became known as Walsh v. The Lord Advocate.”

This is the organisation’s own contemporary account of the case. It records that a preliminary hearing was held in Edinburgh in January 1954, that Lord Strachan ordered the case to proof, that “the proof was set down for November 23, 1954”, and that “H. C. Covington, a United States barrister and the Watch Tower Society’s general counsel” together with “F. W. Franz, vice-president of the Society” and “Grant Suiter, the Society’s secretary and treasurer” flew from New York to give evidence, Franz being “the first to go into the witness box”. It records that “The whole of the evidence had taken seven days to give”, that judgment was given on 7 January 1955, that Lord Strachan held Jehovah’s Witnesses to be a religious denomination but Walsh not to be a “regular minister”, and that the press “devoted more than a thousand column-inches to the case”, The Scotsman reporting fully each day.

Offizielle Quelle

Hinweis zu Herkunft und Überprüfung

Hinweis zur Vertrauensangabe. Opened on the Watchtower Online Library on 19 September 2026 and read in full; the issue was confirmed by locating the article in the Online Library listing for The Watchtower of 1 June 1955, and page numbers taken from the document’s embedded page markers.

Untermauert durch. src-nwto-walsh-1956-hl

Notes. The article states that the appeal would next go to “the High Court of Justiciary in Scotland”. That is Scotland’s supreme criminal court; a civil action for declarator would go to the Inner House of the Court of Session, and the House of Lords report records that the appeal was in fact heard by the Second Division before reaching the House of Lords.

Abgerufen. 19. September 2026 · Quellenkennung. src-nwto-w-1955-0601-walsh

Amtliches öffentliches Dokument Gestützt

The Weekly Law Reports, “Walsh v. Lord Advocate [1956] 1 W.L.R. 1002 (House of Lords)”

19. Juli 1956 · pp.[1956] 1 W.L.R. 1002 · Lord Morton of Henryton, Lord Goddard, Lord Macdermott, Lord Keith of Avonholm, Lord Somervell of Harrow · Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales

“The appellant was born on November 1, 1934. He holds the offices of “pioneer publisher” and “congregation servant” in the body now known as Jehovah’s Witnesses.”

The report records that the Ministry of Labour and National Service wrote to Walsh on 10 January 1953 that “a member of the Society of Jehovah’s Witnesses cannot be regarded as coming within the definition of a regular minister of a religious denomination for the purposes of exemption from liability under paragraph 2 of Schedule I of the National Service Act, 1948”; that the Second Division of the Court of Session dismissed his appeal; that the House of Lords heard the case on 11, 12 and 13 June 1956 and gave judgment on 19 July 1956; and that the appeal was dismissed.

Archivierte oder alternative Kopie

Hinweis zu Herkunft und Überprüfung

Hinweis zur Vertrauensangabe. The full text of the report was opened on 19 September 2026 at uniset.ca, an academic site that reproduces law reports; the case name, citation, panel, hearing dates, the Ministry letter and the disposal were read there. The official Weekly Law Reports volume itself was not consulted, and the case does not appear on the free UK case-law services, so this is recorded as supported rather than verified.

Untermauert durch. src-nwto-w-1955-0601-walsh

Notes. This is the public-record anchor for the Walsh litigation. The report names the respondent only as “the Lord Advocate, representing the Minister of Labour and National Service”, and names Lord Advocate Milligan as leading counsel for the respondent at the 1956 hearing; it nowhere names Clyde. The style “Douglas Walsh v. The Right Honourable James Latham Clyde, M.P., P.C.” appears on the cover sheet of the unprovenanced 1954 typescript (src-nwto-walsh-1954-transcript) and in no source we have opened, so the site must attribute it rather than assert it. The case is sometimes wrongly described as involving the Lord Provost of Glasgow; nothing in the report supports that. The report also records that the office called “company servant” in the summons “is now known as ‘congregation servant’”.

Abgerufen. 19. September 2026 · Quellenkennung. src-nwto-walsh-1956-hl

Seite zur Aussage Berichtigen oder aktualisieren

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/de/evidence/claim-bible-walsh-case-record/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.