JWTruth.orgRecurso documentado de comparación
Ask JWTruth Buscar
Español

Esta página en

Solo en inglés

Todos los idiomas

La Biblia y la traducción · Claim record

Walsh v. The Lord Advocate fue una acción declarativa (action for declarator) ante la Court of Session de Edimburgo, en la que se pedía que se declarara que Douglas Walsh era un ‘regular minister’ (ministro regular) exento del servicio nacional obligatorio. Lord Strachan oyó la prueba a partir del 23 de noviembre de 1954 y dictó sentencia el 7 de enero de 1955: resolvió que los testigos de Jehová son una confesión religiosa, pero que Walsh no era un ‘regular minister’. La Second Division y después la Cámara de los Lores desestimaron el recurso, y la sentencia se dictó el 19 de julio de 1956.

Claim ID claim-bible-walsh-case-recordConcerns 23 de noviembre de 1954Contexto
Contexto · 23 de noviembre de 1954 Verificado

Walsh v. The Lord Advocate fue una acción declarativa (action for declarator) ante la Court of Session de Edimburgo, en la que se pedía que se declarara que Douglas Walsh era un ‘regular minister’ (ministro regular) exento del servicio nacional obligatorio. Lord Strachan oyó la prueba a partir del 23 de noviembre de 1954 y dictó sentencia el 7 de enero de 1955: resolvió que los testigos de Jehová son una confesión religiosa, pero que Walsh no era un ‘regular minister’. La Second Division y después la Cámara de los Lores desestimaron el recurso, y la sentencia se dictó el 19 de julio de 1956. The Watchtower, 1 de junio de 1955The Weekly Law Reports, 19 de julio de 1956

La posición de la organización o su explicación posterior: La Atalaya del 1 de junio de 1955 acogió con satisfacción la conclusión de que los Testigos son una confesión religiosa y citó la declaración de Lord Strachan de que el personal de la sede ‘is sincerely and genuinely engaged upon the task of administering a body which they regard as religious’ [‘se dedica sincera y genuinamente a la tarea de administrar un cuerpo que considera religioso’], al tiempo que discrepaba del fallo sobre la cuestión ministerial.

Mostrar las pruebas (2 fuentes)
Publicación primaria de los testigos de Jehová Verificado

The Watchtower, “Jehovah’s Witnesses—A Religion Without Ministers?”

1 de junio de 1955 · pp.329-332 · Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc.

“An action for declarator was brought in Scotland that asked the Court of Session to declare that Douglas Walsh was a “regular minister” because of his appointment as a pioneer and also because of his appointment as a congregation servant. The case became known as Walsh v. The Lord Advocate.”

This is the organisation’s own contemporary account of the case. It records that a preliminary hearing was held in Edinburgh in January 1954, that Lord Strachan ordered the case to proof, that “the proof was set down for November 23, 1954”, and that “H. C. Covington, a United States barrister and the Watch Tower Society’s general counsel” together with “F. W. Franz, vice-president of the Society” and “Grant Suiter, the Society’s secretary and treasurer” flew from New York to give evidence, Franz being “the first to go into the witness box”. It records that “The whole of the evidence had taken seven days to give”, that judgment was given on 7 January 1955, that Lord Strachan held Jehovah’s Witnesses to be a religious denomination but Walsh not to be a “regular minister”, and that the press “devoted more than a thousand column-inches to the case”, The Scotsman reporting fully each day.

Fuente oficial

Nota de procedencia y verificación

Nota de confianza. Opened on the Watchtower Online Library on 19 September 2026 and read in full; the issue was confirmed by locating the article in the Online Library listing for The Watchtower of 1 June 1955, and page numbers taken from the document’s embedded page markers.

Corroborado por. src-nwto-walsh-1956-hl

Notes. The article states that the appeal would next go to “the High Court of Justiciary in Scotland”. That is Scotland’s supreme criminal court; a civil action for declarator would go to the Inner House of the Court of Session, and the House of Lords report records that the appeal was in fact heard by the Second Division before reaching the House of Lords.

Consultado. 19 de septiembre de 2026 · Identificador de la fuente. src-nwto-w-1955-0601-walsh

Registro público oficial Respaldado

The Weekly Law Reports, “Walsh v. Lord Advocate [1956] 1 W.L.R. 1002 (House of Lords)”

19 de julio de 1956 · pp.[1956] 1 W.L.R. 1002 · Lord Morton of Henryton, Lord Goddard, Lord Macdermott, Lord Keith of Avonholm, Lord Somervell of Harrow · Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales

“The appellant was born on November 1, 1934. He holds the offices of “pioneer publisher” and “congregation servant” in the body now known as Jehovah’s Witnesses.”

The report records that the Ministry of Labour and National Service wrote to Walsh on 10 January 1953 that “a member of the Society of Jehovah’s Witnesses cannot be regarded as coming within the definition of a regular minister of a religious denomination for the purposes of exemption from liability under paragraph 2 of Schedule I of the National Service Act, 1948”; that the Second Division of the Court of Session dismissed his appeal; that the House of Lords heard the case on 11, 12 and 13 June 1956 and gave judgment on 19 July 1956; and that the appeal was dismissed.

Copia archivada o alternativa

Nota de procedencia y verificación

Nota de confianza. The full text of the report was opened on 19 September 2026 at uniset.ca, an academic site that reproduces law reports; the case name, citation, panel, hearing dates, the Ministry letter and the disposal were read there. The official Weekly Law Reports volume itself was not consulted, and the case does not appear on the free UK case-law services, so this is recorded as supported rather than verified.

Corroborado por. src-nwto-w-1955-0601-walsh

Notes. This is the public-record anchor for the Walsh litigation. The report names the respondent only as “the Lord Advocate, representing the Minister of Labour and National Service”, and names Lord Advocate Milligan as leading counsel for the respondent at the 1956 hearing; it nowhere names Clyde. The style “Douglas Walsh v. The Right Honourable James Latham Clyde, M.P., P.C.” appears on the cover sheet of the unprovenanced 1954 typescript (src-nwto-walsh-1954-transcript) and in no source we have opened, so the site must attribute it rather than assert it. The case is sometimes wrongly described as involving the Lord Provost of Glasgow; nothing in the report supports that. The report also records that the office called “company servant” in the summons “is now known as ‘congregation servant’”.

Consultado. 19 de septiembre de 2026 · Identificador de la fuente. src-nwto-walsh-1956-hl

Página de la afirmación Corregir o actualizar

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/es/evidence/claim-bible-walsh-case-record/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.