JWTruth.orgRessource documentaire comparative
Ask JWTruth Rechercher
Français

Cette page en

En anglais uniquement

Toutes les langues

La Bible et la traduction · Claim record

Aucun manuscrit grec subsistant du Nouveau Testament ne contient le Tétragramme, ni en caractères hébreux ni en caractères grecs, aux endroits où la Traduction du monde nouveau porte « Jéhovah ».

Claim ID claim-bible-jehovah-no-ms-evidenceConcerns 2020Contexte
Contexte · 2020 Vérifié

Aucun manuscrit grec subsistant du Nouveau Testament ne contient le Tétragramme, ni en caractères hébreux ni en caractères grecs, aux endroits où la Traduction du monde nouveau porte « Jéhovah ». In die Skriflig / In Luce Verbi, 2020New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures (Study Edition), 2013

Position de l’organisation ou explication ultérieure : L’appendice C1 de l’organisation ne le conteste pas. Il déclare : « Aujourd’hui, cependant, nous ne disposons d’aucun manuscrit du “Nouveau Testament” du premier siècle de notre ère que nous puissions examiner. Personne ne peut donc vérifier les manuscrits grecs originaux du “Nouveau Testament” pour voir si les rédacteurs de la Bible ont employé le Tétragramme », et il soutient que les copistes, à partir du deuxième ou du début du troisième siècle, ont substitué Kyrios ou Theos.

Afficher les preuves (2 sources)
Évalué par des pairs / universitaire Vérifié

In die Skriflig / In Luce Verbi, “Rendering the Divine Name in Romans 10:13”

2020 · pp.vol. 54, no. 1 · A. Tim Span, Stuart T. Rochester and Fika J. van Rensburg (Faculty of Theology, North-West University, South Africa) · AOSIS Publishing (open access); DOI 10.4102/ids.v54i1.2560

“There are no extant Greek New Testament manuscripts that contain the Tetragrammaton in Hebrew or Greek characters, and the multiplication of late Hebrew versions carries little weight. The Greek corpus of New Testament manuscripts and all early versions fail to yield an original New Testament Tetragrammaton, and the J versions offer little extra.”

A peer-reviewed, open-access article evaluating George Howard's 1977 hypothesis — the hypothesis on which the New World Translation's practice partly rests — through the test case of Romans 10:13. The authors conclude: 'An original Tetragrammaton lacks documentary and contextual support in Romans 10:13.'

Source officielle

Note de provenance et de vérification

Note sur la fiabilité. The full text of the article was opened on scielo.org.za on 19 September 2026 and the quoted sentences read in context. The journal is peer-reviewed and open access; the article carries a DOI.

Corroboré par. src-nwtv-nwtsty-c1

Notes. The article is written from a confessional Reformed standpoint, which the site should say plainly when citing it. Its factual statement about the manuscript corpus is not in dispute among textual critics, including those who are sympathetic to Howard.

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-nwtv-span-2020

Publication primaire des Témoins de Jéhovah Vérifié

New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures (Study Edition), “Appendix C1: The Restoration of the Divine Name in the “New Testament””

2013 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“Today, however, no manuscripts of the “New Testament” from the first century C.E. are available for us to examine. So no one can check the original Greek manuscripts of the “New Testament” to see whether the Bible writers used the Tetragrammaton. The Greek manuscripts of the “New Testament” that would have a bearing on this issue are copies that were made from about 200 C.E. onward.”

The organisation's own appendix states plainly that the case for restoring the divine name rests on inference rather than on manuscript evidence. It then poses the translator's choice: 'Will he follow the Greek text that uses Kyʹri·os or The·osʹ instead of the Tetragrammaton, or will he endeavor to ascertain where the Tetragrammaton would have appeared in the original Greek manuscripts?'

Source officielle

Note de provenance et de vérification

Note sur la fiabilité. Appendix C1 opened in full on wol.jw.org on 19 September 2026 and read from beginning to end.

Corroboré par. src-nwtv-nwt-a5, src-nwtv-span-2020

Notes. This is the fairest and most useful single quotation on the subject: the organisation itself does not claim manuscript support.

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-nwtv-nwtsty-c1

Page de l’affirmation Corriger ou mettre à jour

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/fr/evidence/claim-bible-jehovah-no-ms-evidence/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.