JWTruth.orgRessource documentaire comparative
Ask JWTruth Rechercher
Français

Cette page en

En anglais uniquement

Toutes les langues

La doctrine sur le sang · Claim record

La procédure que décrit l'article est rapportée sous la référence Re L.D.K. (1985), 48 R.F.L. (2d) 164 (Cour provinciale de l'Ontario, division de la famille) ; la Cour suprême du Canada l'a résumée dans A.C. v. Manitoba, notant que deux médecins évaluaient à environ trente pour cent les chances d'une issue favorable et que le juge avait conclu qu'un traitement imposé causerait un traumatisme affectif l'emportant sur le bénéfice escompté.

Claim ID claim-blood-1994-kosack-citationConcerns 1985Contexte
Contexte · 1985 Vérifié

La procédure que décrit l'article est rapportée sous la référence Re L.D.K. (1985), 48 R.F.L. (2d) 164 (Cour provinciale de l'Ontario, division de la famille) ; la Cour suprême du Canada l'a résumée dans A.C. v. Manitoba, notant que deux médecins évaluaient à environ trente pour cent les chances d'une issue favorable et que le juge avait conclu qu'un traitement imposé causerait un traumatisme affectif l'emportant sur le bénéfice escompté. Supreme Court of Canada, 26 juin 2009Awake!, 22 mai 1994

Afficher les preuves (2 sources)
Document public officiel Vérifié

Supreme Court of Canada, “A.C. v. Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), 2009 SCC 30, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 181”

26 juin 2009 · pp.[2009] 2 S.C.R. 181 at 221-222 · paras. 62-63 (and para. 128 per McLachlin CJ) · Abella J · Supreme Court of Canada

“In Re L.D.K. (1985), 48 R.F.L. (2d) 164 (Ont. Prov. Ct. (Fam. Div.)), for example, the patient was a 12-year-old girl suffering from acute myeloid leukaemia. … In Re A.Y. (1993), 111 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 91 (Nfld. S.C.), the court was faced with an application from the Director of Child Welfare to impose treatment on a 15-year-old Jehovah’s Witness who had cancer.”

The Supreme Court of Canada’s own summary of the two Canadian decisions described in the 22 May 1994 Awake!. Of Re L.D.K. the Court records that two doctors put the odds of a favourable outcome at around 30 per cent, that Main Prov. Ct. J. found ‘the emotional trauma [the child] would experience’ in forced treatment would outweigh the anticipated benefits (p. 169), and that he concluded ‘[T]his child’s life is equally in danger whichever path is taken’ (p. 170). Of Re A.Y. it records that Wells J noted the treatment was less than 40 per cent likely to be effective, was not ‘essential’, and was contrary to the mature adolescent’s wishes, so that he was not a child in need of protection. At para. 128 the Chief Justice describes the same boy as ‘a 15-year-old boy suffering from terminal cancer’.

Source officielle

Note de provenance et de vérification

Note sur la fiabilité. The official Supreme Court of Canada PDF of the judgment was downloaded from decisions.scc-csc.ca (with a Referer header, since the file otherwise returns 403), converted to text with pdftotext and read; paragraphs 62, 63 and 128 were confirmed word for word.

Corroboré par. src-g94d-kosack-judgment, src-g94d-yeatts-wells-decision

Notes. This is the best available confirmation of the citations for the Kosack and Yeatts proceedings. Neither law report was opened directly; CanLII is bot-blocked in this environment.

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-g94d-scc-ac-paras-62-63

Publication primaire des Témoins de Jéhovah Vérifié

Awake!, “Youths Who Have “Power Beyond What Is Normal””

22 mai 1994 · p.14 · pars. 46-51 · Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc.

“I must find that she has been discriminated against on the basis of her religion and her age pursuant to s. 15(1). In these circumstances, upon being given a blood transfusion, her right to the security of her person pursuant to s. 7 was infringed.”

Extracts printed in the article from the decision of Judge Main. The sections cited are sections 7 and 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. He also said he refused to make any order that would put the child through the ordeal of a forced transfusion, described her as ‘courageous’ with ‘wisdom and maturity well beyond her years’, and dismissed the application.

Source officielle

Note de provenance et de vérification

Note sur la fiabilité. Opened on the Watchtower Online Library on 19 September 2026 and the wording, page marker and paragraph confirmed against the article text.

Corroboré par. src-g-1994-0522-power-beyond-normal, src-g94d-scc-ac-paras-62-63

Notes. Reported as Re L.D.K. (1985), 48 R.F.L. (2d) 164 (Ont. Prov. Ct. (Fam. Div.)). The law report itself was not opened; the citation is confirmed from the Supreme Court of Canada.

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-g94d-kosack-judgment

Page de l’affirmation Corriger ou mettre à jour

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/fr/evidence/claim-blood-1994-kosack-citation/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.