Accountability
Corrections log
If we get something wrong, we say so here, in public, with the date. An evidence resource that hides its corrections is not one you should trust.
If you are named on this site, or you are the family of someone named, you may ask us to remove or amend what is said about you. Write to [email protected]. We will reply, and we will remove a name wherever the point can be made without it. You do not have to explain why, and you do not have to show that anything is inaccurate.
| Date | Page | What happened | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 September 2026 | / | First release. No published corrections yet. Errors reported through the report-an-error page will be logged here with the date, the page affected, what was wrong and what was changed. | corrected |
| 19 September 2026 | /doctrine/ | The Golden Age sentence about serum inoculations and vaccinations polluting the blood stream was presented as the magazine’s own advice to readers. It is a signed contribution by H. W. Newcomb, beginning on page 106 of the issue of 13 November 1929 and listed in the contents under “Science and Invention”. The source record gave no author and the article title “(dietetics article)”. Treating a signed contribution as a publication’s editorial voice is the same error this site corrects in other people’s citations of the same sentence. The record, the claim and the vaccination comparison now name the author and say what the by-line means. Found by an internal adversarial review, not reported by a reader. | corrected |
| 19 September 2026 | /doctrine/ | The sentence describing vaccination as a violation of the covenant with Noah, attributed to The Golden Age of 4 February 1931, was carried in a quotation field although no copy of that issue had been opened. Its wording came from campaigning and reference websites which may not be independent of one another. Under this site’s own rule such sites locate a document and never supply the evidence, so the quotation has been removed, the record downgraded to unverified, and the point is now described as reported rather than quoted. Found by an internal adversarial review. | corrected |
How corrections work
- Anyone can report an error. Reports that quote a claim or source ID are quickest to check.
- We re-open the cited source. If the wording, date, page or context is wrong, we fix the ledger and the page, and log it here.
- If a report is declined we log that too, with the reason, so that readers can judge for themselves.
- Where the organisation has published a response to something we document, we add it to the relevant claim as “the organisation’s position”.