Accountability
Corrections log
If we get something wrong, we say so here, in public, with the date. An evidence resource that hides its corrections is not one you should trust.
Si aparece nombrado en este sitio, o es familiar de alguien nombrado, puede pedirnos que retiremos o modifiquemos lo que aquí se dice sobre usted. Escriba a [email protected]. Le responderemos, y retiraremos un nombre siempre que el punto pueda exponerse sin él. No tiene que explicar por qué, ni tiene que demostrar que algo sea inexacto.
| Date | Page | What happened | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 September 2026 | / | First release. No published corrections yet. Errors reported through the report-an-error page will be logged here with the date, the page affected, what was wrong and what was changed. | corrected |
| 19 September 2026 | /doctrine/ | The Golden Age sentence about serum inoculations and vaccinations polluting the blood stream was presented as the magazine’s own advice to readers. It is a signed contribution by H. W. Newcomb, beginning on page 106 of the issue of 13 November 1929 and listed in the contents under “Science and Invention”. The source record gave no author and the article title “(dietetics article)”. Treating a signed contribution as a publication’s editorial voice is the same error this site corrects in other people’s citations of the same sentence. The record, the claim and the vaccination comparison now name the author and say what the by-line means. Found by an internal adversarial review, not reported by a reader. | corrected |
| 19 September 2026 | /doctrine/ | The sentence describing vaccination as a violation of the covenant with Noah, attributed to The Golden Age of 4 February 1931, was carried in a quotation field although no copy of that issue had been opened. Its wording came from campaigning and reference websites which may not be independent of one another. Under this site’s own rule such sites locate a document and never supply the evidence, so the quotation has been removed, the record downgraded to unverified, and the point is now described as reported rather than quoted. Found by an internal adversarial review. | corrected |
Cómo funcionan las correcciones
- Cualquiera puede informar de un error. Los avisos que citan el identificador de una afirmación o de una fuente son los más rápidos de comprobar.
- Volvemos a abrir la fuente citada. Si la redacción, la fecha, la página o el contexto están equivocados, corregimos el registro y la página, y lo anotamos aquí.
- Si se rechaza un aviso, también lo anotamos, con el motivo, para que los lectores puedan juzgar por sí mismos.
- Cuando la organización ha publicado una respuesta a algo que documentamos, la añadimos a la afirmación correspondiente como «la posición de la organización».