ClaimThe Bible and the translationsupportedundatedContext

La Biblia y la traducción · Claim record

La disputa sobre Tito 2:13 es muy anterior a la Traducción del Nuevo Mundo. El volumen del siglo XIX sobre las cartas pastorales de la serie de comentarios críticos de Meyer, escrito por Johann Eduard Huther, concluía que la cuestión “cannot be decided on purely grammatical grounds” [“no puede decidirse por motivos puramente gramaticales”], y señalaba que “There are instances enough of two distinct subjects standing under one article only” [“Hay suficientes casos de dos sujetos distintos regidos por un solo artículo”].

Claim ID claim-bible-titus-2-13-dispute-predates-nwtContexto

La afirmación y sus pruebas

Contexto Respaldado

La disputa sobre Tito 2:13 es muy anterior a la Traducción del Nuevo Mundo. El volumen del siglo XIX sobre las cartas pastorales de la serie de comentarios críticos de Meyer, escrito por Johann Eduard Huther, concluía que la cuestión “cannot be decided on purely grammatical grounds” [“no puede decidirse por motivos puramente gramaticales”], y señalaba que “There are instances enough of two distinct subjects standing under one article only” [“Hay suficientes casos de dos sujetos distintos regidos por un solo artículo”]. Source: Critical and Exegetical Hand-book to the Epistles to Timothy and Titus (the Pastoral Epistles volume of Meyer’s Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar series)

Mostrar las pruebas (1 fuente)
Revisado por pares / académico Respaldado

Critical and Exegetical Hand-book to the Epistles to Timothy and Titus (the Pastoral Epistles volume of Meyer’s Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar series), “Commentary on Titus 2:13”

· Johann Eduard Huther · Reproduced on Bible Hub; English translation published by T&T Clark, Edinburgh, and Funk & Wagnalls, New York

“It cannot be decided on purely grammatical grounds, for μεγ. Θεοῦ and σωτῆρος ἡμ. may be two attributes referring to Ἰησ. Χριστοῦ; still it may be also that σωτῆρ. ἡμῶν Ἰησ. Χρ. is a subject distinct from μεγ. Θεοῦ, even although only one article is used.”

Huther sets out the history of the dispute among commentators and concludes that the single article does not settle it. In a footnote he adds: 'There are instances enough of two distinct subjects standing under one article only, and we cannot see why these instances should not be quoted here.'

Nota de procedencia y verificación for Critical and Exegetical Hand-book to the Epistles to Timothy and Titus (the Pastoral Epistles volume of Meyer’s Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar series), Commentary on Titus 2:13

Nota de confianza. Bible Hub's commentary page was opened on 19 September 2026 and the passage read in full. Independent audit, 19 September 2026: this record previously attributed the passage to Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer and dated it 1880. The volume on the Pastoral Epistles in Meyer’s series is by Johann Eduard Huther (1807-1880); the text itself refers to Meyer in the third person (“comp. Meyer on the passage”, “my commentary on the passages”), and the Pulpit Commentary on the same Bible Hub page summarises the position as “Huther’s conclusion”. The German fourth edition is 1876 and English printings include Edinburgh (T&T Clark) and New York (Funk & Wagnalls, 1885); Bible Hub does not say which printing it reproduces, so no date is recorded. The text was read on Bible Hub’s reproduction and not in any printed edition, so the confidence is “supported” rather than “verified”.

Procedencia del escaneo. Public-domain nineteenth-century commentary reproduced in full text by Bible Hub.

Notes. Cited to show the site's readers that the dispute at Titus 2:13 predates the New World Translation by a century and is a genuine grammatical dispute, not an invention of either side.

Consultado. 19 de septiembre de 2026 · Identificador de la fuente. src-nwtv-huther-titus-2-13

Página de la afirmación Corregir o actualizar

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/es/evidence/claim-bible-titus-2-13-dispute-predates-nwt/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.