JWTruth.orgRecurso documentado de comparación
Ask JWTruth Buscar
Español

Esta página en

Solo en inglés

Todos los idiomas

Cronología y 607 a. E.C. · Claim record

La organización reconoce por escrito que existen tablillas administrativas fechadas para todos los años que suelen atribuirse a los reyes neobabilónicos, y que sumar esos reinados contando hacia atrás desde Nabonido da el 587 a.e.c. para la destrucción de Jerusalén. Su respuesta es que entre dos de ellos pudo haber reinado un rey no registrado.

Claim ID claim-chronology-org-concedes-tablets-give-587Concerns 1 de noviembre de 2011Explicación de la organización
Explicación de la organización · 1 de noviembre de 2011 Verificado

La organización reconoce por escrito que existen tablillas administrativas fechadas para todos los años que suelen atribuirse a los reyes neobabilónicos, y que sumar esos reinados contando hacia atrás desde Nabonido da el 587 a.e.c. para la destrucción de Jerusalén. Su respuesta es que entre dos de ellos pudo haber reinado un rey no registrado. The Watchtower, 1 de noviembre de 2011The Watchtower, 1 de noviembre de 2011

La posición de la organización o su explicación posterior: 'Pero este método de fechar solo funciona si cada rey de la lista relevó a su predecesor inmediatamente, sin nadie que gobernara entre ellos.'

Mostrar las pruebas (2 fuentes)
Publicación primaria de los testigos de Jehová Verificado

The Watchtower, “When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?-Part Two, footnote e”

1 de noviembre de 2011 · p.24 · footnote e · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“Business tablets exist for all the years traditionally attributed to the Neo-Babylonian kings. When the years that these kings ruled are totaled and a calculation is made back from the last Neo-Babylonian king, Nabonidus, the date reached for the destruction of Jerusalem is 587 B.C.E. However, this method of dating works only if each king followed the other in the same year, without any breaks in between.”

A footnote in which the organisation concedes that the dated business tablets cover every year of the Neo-Babylonian period and, added up, give 587 BCE. Its answer is that an unrecorded king might have reigned between two of them.

Fuente oficial

Nota de procedencia y verificación

Nota de confianza. Read in the Watchtower Online Library text of the article on 19 September 2026 in the [Footnotes] section. The Online Library prints all footnotes together at the end of the article, so the page is taken from the position of the footnote’s reference marker in the body: the marker for note e falls between the page markers for pages 24 and 25.

Corroborado por. src-chr-e-pd-1942-p9-10-transitions, src-chr-e-oracc-adadguppi-i29

Consultado. 19 de septiembre de 2026 · Identificador de la fuente. src-chr-e-w11-1101-footnote-e

Publicación primaria de los testigos de Jehová Verificado

The Watchtower, “When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?-Part Two”

1 de noviembre de 2011 · pp.22-28 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“Clearly, much of the astronomical data in VAT 4956 fits the year 588 B.C.E. as the 37th year of Nebuchadnezzar II. This, therefore, supports the date of 607 B.C.E. for Jerusalem's destruction-just as the Bible indicates.”

The organisation's positive case from the cuneiform record. It argues that the Babylonian chronicles are incomplete, that business tablets show discrepancies at reign transitions, and that thirteen sets of lunar positions on VAT 4956 match 588/587 BCE.

Fuente oficial

Nota de procedencia y verificación

Nota de confianza. The whole article was fetched from the Watchtower Online Library on 19 September 2026 and read with page markers intact; the quotation is on page 27.

Corroborado por. src-chr-e-w11-1001-part-one

Notes. Note 21, the authority for the claim that the lunar position in line 3 matches Nisanu 9 of 588 BCE, is present in the Online Library text and reads: “VAT 4956 reads on line three: ‘The moon stood 1 cubit [or 2 degrees] in front of ß Virginis.’ The previously mentioned analysis concluded that on Nisanu 9, the moon was 2°04ʹ in front of and 0° below the star ß Virginis. It was considered an exact match.” It names no external authority: “the previously mentioned analysis” is the organisation’s own, described in note 19 as having been made with the software TheSky6, the freeware Cartes du Ciel / Sky Charts and a US Naval Observatory date converter. No astronomer, publication or independent calculation is cited for it.

Consultado. 19 de septiembre de 2026 · Identificador de la fuente. src-chr-e-w11-1101-part-two

Página de la afirmación Corregir o actualizar

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/es/evidence/claim-chronology-org-concedes-tablets-give-587/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.