ClaimChronology and 607 BCEverified1940sExplicit statement

Cronología y 607 a. E.C. · Claim record

La cronología de referencia de Parker y Dubberstein fija cada reinado neobabilónico a partir de tablillas comerciales y administrativas fechadas. En el paso de Nabucodonosor II a Amel-Marduk, la última tablilla del reinado anterior y la primera del nuevo llevan la misma fecha, el 7 de octubre de 562 a.E.C.; en el paso de Amel-Marduk a Neriglisar el intervalo es de seis días.

Claim ID claim-chronology-business-tablets-transitionsConcerns 1942Declaración explícita

La afirmación y sus pruebas

Declaración explícita · 1942 Verificado

La cronología de referencia de Parker y Dubberstein fija cada reinado neobabilónico a partir de tablillas comerciales y administrativas fechadas. En el paso de Nabucodonosor II a Amel-Marduk, la última tablilla del reinado anterior y la primera del nuevo llevan la misma fecha, el 7 de octubre de 562 a.E.C.; en el paso de Amel-Marduk a Neriglisar el intervalo es de seis días. Source: Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C. - A.D. 45 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 24), 1942Source: Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C. - A.D. 45 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 24), 1942

La posición de la organización o su explicación posterior: La organización señala tablillas que parecen fechar al sucesor de Nabucodonosor antes del final del último año de Nabucodonosor y pregunta si el registro es continuo.

Mostrar las pruebas (2 fuentes)
Revisado por pares / académico Verificado

Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C. - A.D. 45 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 24), “II. Kings' Reigns: Nebuchadnezzar II and Amel-Marduk”

1942 · pp.9-10 · Richard A. Parker and Waldo H. Dubberstein · Oriental Institute, University of Chicago

“Evidence for End of Reign VI/14/43 (Sept. 25, 562), Uruk ... VI/26/43 (Oct. 7, 562), Uruk ... The first tablet dated to Amel-Marduk (see below) comes from Sippar (?) and is dated on the same day as the last tablet of Nebuchadnezzar from Uruk. Accordingly Nebuchadnezzar died during the first days of October, 562.”

The standard reference chronology establishes the length of each Neo-Babylonian reign from dated business and administrative tablets, listing for every king the last tablet of his reign and the first tablet of his successor's. At this junction the two are dated to the same day.

Nota de procedencia y verificación for Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C. - A.D. 45 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 24), II. Kings' Reigns: Nebuchadnezzar II and Amel-Marduk

Nota de confianza. The full PDF was downloaded from the ISAC asset server on 19 September 2026, converted with pdftotext and read. The running head reads '10 BABYLONIAN CHRONOLOGY 626 B.C.--A.D. 45'.

Procedencia del escaneo. Free PDF of the volume published by the Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures (formerly the Oriental Institute), University of Chicago; CC BY-NC-ND 4.0; DOI https://doi.org/10.83354/68x5-8f30

Corroborado por. src-chr-e-oracc-adadguppi-i29, src-chr-e-w11-1101-footnote-e

Notes. The same pages show Amel-Marduk’s last tablet on 7 August 560 and Neriglissar’s first on 13 August 560, a gap of six days. Page 10 also carries Labashi-Marduk: first dated tablet 22 May 556, last 20 June 556, with the conclusion that he “seems to have been recognized as king only in May and June, 556”. He is the one king the organisation says Ptolemy omitted who falls inside the Neo-Babylonian dynasty, and the standard chronology accounts for him in weeks, not years.

Consultado. 19 de septiembre de 2026 · Identificador de la fuente. src-chr-e-pd-1942-p9-10-transitions

Revisado por pares / académico Verificado

Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C. - A.D. 45 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 24), “Preface”

1942 · pp.vii · Richard A. Parker and Waldo H. Dubberstein · Oriental Institute, University of Chicago

“This study aims at providing a brief, but complete and thorough, presentation of the data bearing upon the chronological problems of the Neo-Babylonian, Achaemenid Persian, and Seleucid periods, together with tables for the easy translation of dates from the Babylonian calendar into the Julian.”

The authors describe the scope of the work that became, in its revised 1956 edition (Babylonian Chronology 626 B.C.-A.D. 75), the standard reference for converting Babylonian dates.

Nota de procedencia y verificación for Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C. - A.D. 45 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 24), Preface

Nota de confianza. Read in the ISAC PDF on 19 September 2026. Only the 1942 edition (626 B.C.-A.D. 45) was opened in this session; the 1956 Brown University Press revision, which extends to A.D. 75, was not opened and its page numbers are not cited here.

Procedencia del escaneo. Free PDF of the volume published by the Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures (formerly the Oriental Institute), University of Chicago; CC BY-NC-ND 4.0; DOI https://doi.org/10.83354/68x5-8f30

Notes. Wiseman's 1956 volume states that its Julian dates 'follow the tables of R. A. Parker and W. H. Dubberstein in Babylonian Chronology 626 B.C.-A.D. 45'.

Consultado. 19 de septiembre de 2026 · Identificador de la fuente. src-chr-e-pd-1942-preface

Página de la afirmación Corregir o actualizar

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/es/evidence/claim-chronology-business-tablets-transitions/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.