JWTruth.orgRecurso documentado de comparación
Ask JWTruth Buscar
Español

Esta página en

Solo en inglés

Todos los idiomas

Cronología y 607 a. E.C. · Claim record

Los reyes que, según la organización, omite el Canon de Tolomeo no alargan el tramo que importa. Ashur-etil-ilani y Sin-shar-ishkun fueron reconocidos en Babilonia antes de que Nabopolasar ocupara allí el trono en el 626 a.e.c., de modo que añadirlos alarga el período anterior a la dinastía neobabilónica, no el intervalo entre el año dieciocho de Nabucodonosor y la caída de Babilonia; la inscripción de Adad-guppi ya cuenta por separado el tercer año de Ashur-etil-ilani, y lo sitúa antes de Nabopolasar. El único rey omitido que sí cae dentro de la dinastía, Labasi-Marduk, aparece nombrado en el propio artículo, y Parker y Dubberstein fechan su primera y su última tablilla el 22 de mayo y el 20 de junio del 556 a.e.c. y concluyen que “seems to have been recognized as king only in May and June, 556” - semanas, no años.

Claim ID claim-chronology-ptolemy-omissions-are-pre-dynasticConcerns 1 de octubre de 2011Contexto
Contexto · 1 de octubre de 2011 Verificado

Los reyes que, según la organización, omite el Canon de Tolomeo no alargan el tramo que importa. Ashur-etil-ilani y Sin-shar-ishkun fueron reconocidos en Babilonia antes de que Nabopolasar ocupara allí el trono en el 626 a.e.c., de modo que añadirlos alarga el período anterior a la dinastía neobabilónica, no el intervalo entre el año dieciocho de Nabucodonosor y la caída de Babilonia; la inscripción de Adad-guppi ya cuenta por separado el tercer año de Ashur-etil-ilani, y lo sitúa antes de Nabopolasar. El único rey omitido que sí cae dentro de la dinastía, Labasi-Marduk, aparece nombrado en el propio artículo, y Parker y Dubberstein fechan su primera y su última tablilla el 22 de mayo y el 20 de junio del 556 a.e.c. y concluyen que “seems to have been recognized as king only in May and June, 556” - semanas, no años. The Watchtower, 1 de octubre de 2011Chronicles of Chaldaean Kings (626-556 B.C.) in the British Museum, 1956RIBo, Babylon 7: The Inscriptions of the Neo-Babylonian Dynasty, 2020Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C. - A.D. 45 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 24), 1942

La posición de la organización o su explicación posterior: 'En general, se considera que el Canon de Tolomeo es exacto. Pero, en vista de las omisiones que hace, ¿puede servir de base para una cronología histórica incuestionable?'

Mostrar las pruebas (4 fuentes)
Publicación primaria de los testigos de Jehová Verificado

The Watchtower, “When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?-Part One, 'The Canon of Ptolemy'”

1 de octubre de 2011 · pp.30-31 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“Notice that Ptolemy lists only four kings between the Babylonian rulers Kandalanu and Nabonidus. However, the Uruk King List-a part of the cuneiform record-reveals that seven kings ruled in between. ... In general, Ptolemy's canon is regarded as accurate. But in view of its omissions, should it really be used to provide a definite historical chronology?”

The organisation's argument that Ptolemy's canon omits kings. Its examples, Sin-sharra-ishkun and Ashur-etel-ilani, belong to the Assyrian succession before Nabopolassar took the throne of Babylon in 626 BCE.

Fuente oficial

Nota de procedencia y verificación

Nota de confianza. Read in the Watchtower Online Library text on 19 September 2026; page markers place the passage across pages 30 and 31. Notes 8 and 9 of the article name Sin-sharra-ishkun and Ashur-etel-ilani.

Corroborado por. src-chr-e-wiseman-1956-p6-assyrian-kings, src-chr-e-oracc-adadguppi-i29

Consultado. 19 de septiembre de 2026 · Identificador de la fuente. src-chr-e-w11-1001-ptolemy

Revisado por pares / académico Verificado

Chronicles of Chaldaean Kings (626-556 B.C.) in the British Museum, “Introduction: the fall of Assyria”

1956 · p.6 · D. J. Wiseman · The Trustees of the British Museum, London

“Kandalanu appears to have rebelled against his overlord during the period of uncertainty over the succession which followed the death of Assur-etil-ilani, the successor of Ashurbanipal.”

Wiseman places Ashur-etel-ilani, and elsewhere Sin-shar-ishkun 'the king of Assyria', in the Assyrian succession before Nabopolassar took the throne of Babylon in 626 BCE.

Escaneo del original

Nota de procedencia y verificación

Nota de confianza. Read in the ETANA PDF on 19 September 2026; running head '6 CHRONICLES OF CHALDAEAN KINGS'. Elsewhere in the same volume Wiseman writes of 'Sin-sar-iskun, the king of Assyria' opposing the Babylonians 'before Nabopolassar's accession'.

Procedencia del escaneo. Full scan of the British Museum volume hosted by ETANA (Electronic Tools and Ancient Near Eastern Archives), an academic digital-library consortium. Copyright the Trustees of the British Museum, 1956.

Corroborado por. src-chr-e-oracc-adadguppi-i29

Consultado. 19 de septiembre de 2026 · Identificador de la fuente. src-chr-e-wiseman-1956-p6-assyrian-kings

Revisado por pares / académico Verificado

RIBo, Babylon 7: The Inscriptions of the Neo-Babylonian Dynasty, “Nabonidus 2001 (the Harran stele of Adad-guppi), column i line 29”

2020 · i 29 · Frauke Weiershaeuser and Jamie Novotny (edition) · Oracc / LMU Munich

“From the twentieth year of Ashurbanipal, king of Assyria, (during) which I was born, until the forty-second year of Ashurbanipal, the third year of Aššur-etel-ilāni, his son, the twenty-first year of Nabopolassar, the forty-third year of Nebuchadnezzar (II), the second year of Amēl-Marduk, (and) the fourth year of Neriglissar, after (these) ninety-five years”

Adad-guppi, the mother of King Nabonidus, dates her own long life by naming in order the regnal years it ran between. The count starts in the twentieth year of Ashurbanipal, in which she says she was born, and ends in the fourth year of Neriglissar, and the inscription calls that span ninety-five years: a further twenty-two years of Ashurbanipal, then three, twenty-one, forty-three, two and four. The inscription is a sixth-century BCE document from Harran, written within living memory of the reigns it counts.

Fuente oficial Copia archivada o alternativa

Nota de procedencia y verificación

Nota de confianza. The Oracc HTML edition was downloaded and read on 19 September 2026; the transliteration and the English translation of column i 29 were read together and the line label “(i 29)” read from the page. Oracc asks that the page be cited as http://oracc.org/ribo/Q005471/. The year-numbers named here are the points the count runs between, not a list of reign lengths: 22 + 3 + 21 + 43 + 2 + 4 = 95.

Procedencia del escaneo. Royal Inscriptions of Babylonia online (RIBo), Babylon 7, edited by Frauke Weiershaeuser and Jamie Novotny for the Munich Open-access Cuneiform Corpus Initiative at LMU Munich; CC BY-SA 3.0.

Corroborado por. src-chr-e-oracc-adadguppi-ii40, src-chr-e-pd-1942-p9-10-transitions

Notes. The same inscription records that Sin kept her alive 'for 104 good years' from the time of Ashurbanipal 'until the ninth year of Nabonidus'.

Consultado. 19 de septiembre de 2026 · Identificador de la fuente. src-chr-e-oracc-adadguppi-i29

Revisado por pares / académico Verificado

Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C. - A.D. 45 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 24), “II. Kings' Reigns: Nebuchadnezzar II and Amel-Marduk”

1942 · pp.9-10 · Richard A. Parker and Waldo H. Dubberstein · Oriental Institute, University of Chicago

“Evidence for End of Reign VI/14/43 (Sept. 25, 562), Uruk ... VI/26/43 (Oct. 7, 562), Uruk ... The first tablet dated to Amel-Marduk (see below) comes from Sippar (?) and is dated on the same day as the last tablet of Nebuchadnezzar from Uruk. Accordingly Nebuchadnezzar died during the first days of October, 562.”

The standard reference chronology establishes the length of each Neo-Babylonian reign from dated business and administrative tablets, listing for every king the last tablet of his reign and the first tablet of his successor's. At this junction the two are dated to the same day.

Fuente oficial Escaneo del original

Nota de procedencia y verificación

Nota de confianza. The full PDF was downloaded from the ISAC asset server on 19 September 2026, converted with pdftotext and read. The running head reads '10 BABYLONIAN CHRONOLOGY 626 B.C.--A.D. 45'.

Procedencia del escaneo. Free PDF of the volume published by the Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures (formerly the Oriental Institute), University of Chicago; CC BY-NC-ND 4.0; DOI https://doi.org/10.83354/68x5-8f30

Corroborado por. src-chr-e-oracc-adadguppi-i29, src-chr-e-w11-1101-footnote-e

Notes. The same pages show Amel-Marduk’s last tablet on 7 August 560 and Neriglissar’s first on 13 August 560, a gap of six days. Page 10 also carries Labashi-Marduk: first dated tablet 22 May 556, last 20 June 556, with the conclusion that he “seems to have been recognized as king only in May and June, 556”. He is the one king the organisation says Ptolemy omitted who falls inside the Neo-Babylonian dynasty, and the standard chronology accounts for him in weeks, not years.

Consultado. 19 de septiembre de 2026 · Identificador de la fuente. src-chr-e-pd-1942-p9-10-transitions

Página de la afirmación Corregir o actualizar

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/es/evidence/claim-chronology-ptolemy-omissions-are-pre-dynastic/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.